Why is his neighbor never named in these articles even though the hired firebombers didn't even know the victim personally? Was the neighbor arrested for instigating the firebombing? Why not?
I ask because according to an otherwise dismissable creepy youtube video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
the victim found an explosive device in his driveway this autumn which means three years after the firebombing, he is still in danger. I don't think a carry permit is going to help so I am not writing this in support of right to bear arms. I am questioning why his neighbor is protected to this degree when he should be encouraged to leave the victim alone instead of fearlessly persisting in threatening behavior despite cameras on him. Let Ian Thomson's fifteen minutes of fame conclude without anymore tragedy and injustice.
What kind of town is Port Colborne where everyone is okay with the conduct of this unnamed neighbor?